Kobe’s legacy

My immediate reaction to reports of Kobe Bryant’s death was sorrow.

I’ve never been a big fan. I certainly appreciated his skills, although I take exception to Magic Johnson’s statement that Kobe was the greatest Laker ever. (Fine for you to abdicate, Magic, but what about Jerry West or Kareem?) When it comes to the NBA, I’m more of a Bill Walton girl. Then again, the news of someone’s death always brings an outpouring of love. The sadness and grief make us want to look for the goodness.

Kobe Bryant at a WNBA game with his daughter, Gianna.

Among the praise was considerable focus on his love for the women’s game, from coaching his 13-year-old daughter, who also died in the helicopter crash along with seven others, to his mentoring of Sabrina Ionescu, the University of Oregon phenom who tearfully took the court for a game Sunday afternoon, shortly after the news broke.

Even so, after more than an hour of hagiography, I started to get annoyed. ESPN reporters failed to provide any context to Bryant’s life and career. Yes, he was an incredible athlete; a hall-of-fame lock; a prolific scorer. He was also an “alleged” rapist.

In 2003, while the 27-year old Kobe was rehabbing an injury in Colorado, a 19-year-old hotel staffer accused him of rape. The police reports verify her account of a brutal attack, including bending her over a chair and choking her hard enough leave bruises. He told police, according to a transcript of his interview, choking is “my thing” and said he didn’t stop until he asked if he could ejaculate on her face and she said no. A month later, he admitted to being unfaithful and bought his wife, Vanessa, a $4 million, 8-carat purple diamond “apology” ring.

He was charged but never tried because the young woman, whose reputation had been publicly smeared by Kobe’s legal team, declined to testify. In exchange, Kobe made a public apology. “Although I truly believe this encounter between us was consensual, I recognize now that she did not and does not view this incident the same way I did,” he said in a written statement.

It is critically important, amid the public sorrow and grief, to provide the details of the case against him because, it seems to me, that experience helped reshape his life in a profound way.

Perhaps the charges against him helped him see his actions through a different lens.

I’m certain that rearing four daughters also helped him reframe what transpired that night. What father doesn’t worry about the predatory culture in which we raise boys to become men and pursue women, even to the point that President Trump can talk about grabbing women by the pussy and dismiss it as “locker room talk.”

The redemption for Kobe, I think, was in his involvement in sports for women and girls. His second child, Gigi, was an aspiring basketball star. He became her personal and team coach. They were often photographed together attending major sports events featuring women’s teams.

Kobe became a huge supporter of women’s professional basketball and the women’s US national soccer team and professional women’s tennis.

He had a close bond with Ionescu, a California kid who went to Oregon and has posted more triple-doubles than any other player, male or female, in NCAA history. She surpassed the Pac-12 conference record for assists last week, besting the mark set by Gary Payton, who became an NBA star. On Sunday, after the fourth-ranked Ducks defeated the seventh-ranked Oregon State Beavers, Ionescu said she was dedicating the season to Kobe: “Everything I do, I do it for him,” she said.

Kobe’s legacy as a supporter of women is as important as his accomplishments in the NBA. It also shows that we as people can learn and grow from even the worst mistakes we make.

Kobe was not perfect, and it’s important to remember that, as well as the 81-point game, the 18 all-star teams, and the five NBA championships. Perhaps we can conclude that his transformation as a human being was even more meaningful than his success as an athlete.

The WNBA’s minimal wage

WNBA MVP Elena Delle Donne. (Photo from cnn.com)

After celebrating the Washington Mystics and their remarkable run to the WNBA championship, it’s important to take a minute to think about how we treat these athletes the rest of the year, especially whether or not they are fairly compensated.

Consider that the Sacramento Kings pay Dewayne Dedmon $13.3 million a year, which barely allows him to crack the top 100 among all NBA players, according to data compiled by ESPN.com.

That’s enough money to cover the WNBA’s entire payroll this season.

It’s outrageous that the total compensation for the 200 women on WNBA rosters doesn’t even add up to what a mediocre NBA team is willing to pay a journeyman center. The top salary in the WNBA is capped at $117,500. The median salary is closer to $55,000.

If you think that’s simply a reflection of their value, it is not. If you think it’s because the WNBA is losing money, it’s not. If you think it’s because nobody attends games, it’s not.

The NBA spends about 50% of league revenues on payroll, according to an analysis by Forbes magazine. On the other hand, the WNBA spends about 25% of league revenues on payroll.

The sports giant ESPN paid the WNBA $25 million a year for broadcast rights in 2018. This year, the league also cut a deal with CBS sports to televise 40 live primetime and weekend games. The league realizes at least $27 million a year in ticket revenue, with ticket sales this year again topping 1.5 million. That, by the way, is just about where the NBA was at its 23-year-mark. The WNBA also receives support, as a subsidiary partner, from the NBA. And there are other revenue streams such as concessions, merchandise, betting sites, etc. Exact numbers are difficult to come by in most cases because the leagues finances aren’t public. But even using the artificially low $52 million a year as a baseline revenue, the WNBA payroll is remarkably low by any objective business standard.

The economics don’t argue that the WNBA players should be paid on par with NBA players, but it does suggest that the players are undervalued by at least half, and probably more.

Kicking up a fuss

Carli Lloyd, one of the best players in the history of U.S. women’s soccer showed up this week at a practice for the NFL Philadelphia Eagles and almost on a lark booted a 55-yard field goal.

Lloyd kicked a 55-yard FG at an NFL pre-season practice between the Philadelphia Eagles and Baltimore Ravens.

The feat lit up the Twitterverse, made headlines and had a run through two full news cycles on ESPN. The tone of the reaction was almost entirely surprise, although anyone who follows the US Women’s National Team would hardly be shocked by Lloyd’s leg strength. In the 2015 World Cup final against Japan, she scored the third of her three goals from beyond midfield. (Watch the video: https://youtu.be/mBosyOJ3PIY)

But Lloyd’s practice kick, in a more serious vein, showed that the NFL may be moving closer to gender desegregation.

“Honestly, I don’t think it will be long before we see a woman break through this NFL barrier,” tweeted Gil Brandt, an NFL hall of famer and the Dallas Cowboys’ vice president of player personnel from 1960 to 1988. “I’d give her an honest tryout, if I were, say, the Bears.”

The Chicago Bears experience with kicker Cody Parkey in 2018 was a disaster, including the notorious “double-doink,” when a potential game-winner from 43 yards out was tipped at the line, then hit the left upright and the crossbar. The Bears lost that wild-card game 16-15 to the Eagles. The Bears released Parkey in the spring. This pre-season, they’ve looked at nine kickers — six rookies, three free agents.

Lloyd caught the eye of current NFL team managers, but was ambivalent about a career change.

“I’ve definitely got some inquiries, I’ve definitely got some people talking,” Lloyd told SI TV’s Planet Futbol TV. “Anything is possible but right now, I’m strictly a soccer player and we’ll see what the future holds.”

But are the rewards worth the risk?

As a rookie kicker, she would likely make the league minimum salary of $495,000. That would be a lateral move financially for Lloyd.

In 2017, she reportedly earned $400,000 after signing a three-month contract with Manchester City in the English Premiere League women’s division. After her EPL stint, she rejoined the Houston Dash in the National Women’s Soccer League, where the maximum salary was about $40,000. She was also on the roster of the USWNT for sixteen matches.

This year, playing for the national team in its run to the a second straight World Cup in France, Lloyd stands to make $260,000. (Of course, if the women received the same pay as the men’s national players, Lloyd’s compensation would have topped $1 million).

The cost to her reputation might be more dear.

To step up as the first woman to play in the NFL she would bring notoriety, but not necessarily in the same way as Jackie Robinson breaking the color barrier in Major League Baseball. Maybe more in the way of Bill Veeck signing Eddy Gaedel to the Chicago White Sox.

It would follow her everywhere.

It would be in the first sentence of her obituary.

It would likely overshadow her accomplishments on the soccer pitch, where she has won two Olympic gold medals (and potentially a third in 2020 if she remains with the USWNT), two World Cups, the golden boot and the golden ball awards as the leading scorer and best player in the 2015 World Cup, and was named FIFA Player of the Year in 2015 and 2016.

At 37 years old, Lloyd has already established her superstar credentials. She has nothing left to prove. Risking her stellar credentials for a  cameo in the NFL seems like the wrong choice.