Selling out

In the effort to subjugate women as athletes, many people (usually men) like to argue that nobody watches women’s sports.

Sold-out Matthew Knight Arena, Eugene, Ore. Photo: Oregonlive.com

It’s not true.

We could talk soccer or tennis or gymnastics, but let me use the past week or so in women’s basketball as an example.

On Monday of last week, 13,163 fans packed Colonial Life Arena in Columbia, SC, to watch No. 1 South Carolina edge No. 9 Mississippi State, 81-79. And that wasn’t the biggest crowd of the week. On Thursday, 13,659 showed out at the XL Center in Hartford to watch No. 3 UConn drop a close one to No. 23 Tennessee, 63-58. The same night, at the KFC Yum Center in Louisville, 7,756 paid to see No. 5 Louisville beat unranked University of Virginia, 71-56, and then, on Sunday, another 11,624 saw the Cardinals rip Pitt, 83-49.

Over the weekend, women’s games drew tens of thousands of fans.

  • In Spokane, No. 13 Gonzaga ran away from Loyola Marymount, 78-52, in front of 6,000 people at a sold-out McCarthey Athletic Center.
  • In Knoxville, 10,230 showed up at Thompson-Boling Arena to see Tennessee defeat the No. 14 LSU Tigers.
  • In Tucson, a rowdy crowd of 10,160 saw No. 18 University of Arizona defeat its in-state rival, No. 16 Arizona State University.
  • In Eugene, No. 4 Oregon sold out 12,364- seat Matthew Knight Arena for a rivalry game against No. 7 Oregon State. Oregon won 76-64
  • Two nights later, 50 miles away in Corvallis, the Beavers drew a near capacity 9,301 fans to Gill Coliseum for a rematch with the Ducks, who won again, 66-57.

Two nights ago, 13,919 turned up at XL Center in Hartford to see the US Women’s national team fend off UConn, 79-64, with a fourth-quarter surge.

To sum up: eight days; ten games; 108,176 tickets sold.

Get the point?

It’s simply not true that the public isn’t interested in watching female athletes.

The myth is propagated by TV networks, especially ESPN and Fox, who invest so little in broadcasting female athletes.

Let me use my alma mater to illustrate the point. At 1 p.m. Sunday afternoon, the No. 4 Oregon women played No. 7 Oregon State in Corvallis in a back-and-forth contest that was heightened by likely player of the year Sabrina Ionescu’s friendship with Kobe Bryant. The game was broadcast on ESPN2, although ironically the first half was bumped to the ESPN app because of the news of Bryant’s death. Meanwhile, at 2 p.m. Fox TV aired the No. 14 Oregon men hosting a mediocre UCLA team in a snooze fest that was over by halftime.

I watched both. The women’s game was far more compelling. Hands down.

By the way, the Oregon women have been outdrawing the men at home, averaging 10,363 fans at the Matt compared with an average of 7,502 for men’s games.

One last point about the networks:

From Tuesday of this week to Monday of next, 125 mens basketball games will be televised; 45 of them on Saturday alone, including primetime gems like UMass (8-12) at Davidson (10-9). CBS will carry three games and Fox will carry one. Another 19 games will air on ESPN or FS1. The others will air on subESPN channels or regional broadcasters like BTN or the Pac12 Network.

Compare that with the 41 women’s games that will air the entire week. ESPN and FS1 will air three of those games. None of the major networks will carry a women’s game.

It seems the lack of interest isn’t in fans who choose to buy tickets and attend games, but in network executives (almost entirely men) who fail to recognize the untapped potential that exists in women’s sports.

Kobe’s legacy

My immediate reaction to reports of Kobe Bryant’s death was sorrow.

I’ve never been a big fan. I certainly appreciated his skills, although I take exception to Magic Johnson’s statement that Kobe was the greatest Laker ever. (Fine for you to abdicate, Magic, but what about Jerry West or Kareem?) When it comes to the NBA, I’m more of a Bill Walton girl. Then again, the news of someone’s death always brings an outpouring of love. The sadness and grief make us want to look for the goodness.

Kobe Bryant at a WNBA game with his daughter, Gianna.

Among the praise was considerable focus on his love for the women’s game, from coaching his 13-year-old daughter, who also died in the helicopter crash along with seven others, to his mentoring of Sabrina Ionescu, the University of Oregon phenom who tearfully took the court for a game Sunday afternoon, shortly after the news broke.

Even so, after more than an hour of hagiography, I started to get annoyed. ESPN reporters failed to provide any context to Bryant’s life and career. Yes, he was an incredible athlete; a hall-of-fame lock; a prolific scorer. He was also an “alleged” rapist.

In 2003, while the 27-year old Kobe was rehabbing an injury in Colorado, a 19-year-old hotel staffer accused him of rape. The police reports verify her account of a brutal attack, including bending her over a chair and choking her hard enough leave bruises. He told police, according to a transcript of his interview, choking is “my thing” and said he didn’t stop until he asked if he could ejaculate on her face and she said no. A month later, he admitted to being unfaithful and bought his wife, Vanessa, a $4 million, 8-carat purple diamond “apology” ring.

He was charged but never tried because the young woman, whose reputation had been publicly smeared by Kobe’s legal team, declined to testify. In exchange, Kobe made a public apology. “Although I truly believe this encounter between us was consensual, I recognize now that she did not and does not view this incident the same way I did,” he said in a written statement.

It is critically important, amid the public sorrow and grief, to provide the details of the case against him because, it seems to me, that experience helped reshape his life in a profound way.

Perhaps the charges against him helped him see his actions through a different lens.

I’m certain that rearing four daughters also helped him reframe what transpired that night. What father doesn’t worry about the predatory culture in which we raise boys to become men and pursue women, even to the point that President Trump can talk about grabbing women by the pussy and dismiss it as “locker room talk.”

The redemption for Kobe, I think, was in his involvement in sports for women and girls. His second child, Gigi, was an aspiring basketball star. He became her personal and team coach. They were often photographed together attending major sports events featuring women’s teams.

Kobe became a huge supporter of women’s professional basketball and the women’s US national soccer team and professional women’s tennis.

He had a close bond with Ionescu, a California kid who went to Oregon and has posted more triple-doubles than any other player, male or female, in NCAA history. She surpassed the Pac-12 conference record for assists last week, besting the mark set by Gary Payton, who became an NBA star. On Sunday, after the fourth-ranked Ducks defeated the seventh-ranked Oregon State Beavers, Ionescu said she was dedicating the season to Kobe: “Everything I do, I do it for him,” she said.

Kobe’s legacy as a supporter of women is as important as his accomplishments in the NBA. It also shows that we as people can learn and grow from even the worst mistakes we make.

Kobe was not perfect, and it’s important to remember that, as well as the 81-point game, the 18 all-star teams, and the five NBA championships. Perhaps we can conclude that his transformation as a human being was even more meaningful than his success as an athlete.

Six figures and single rooms

So, I really want to be happy about the new collective bargaining agreement the WNBA players signed this week. It’s so much better than the previous agreement, yet it falls short in several critical areas.

WNBA players union president Nneka Ogwumike, a star forward for the LA Sparks.

Good Morning America reported a “landmark deal” that for the first time in WNBA history athlete establishes a six-figure minimum salary for all players and allows the league’s top players to earn up to half a million dollars. It also includes paid maternity leave and a provision that players don’t have to share hotel rooms on road trips. Players association president Nneka Ogwumike and WNBA boss Cathy Engelbert disclosed the eight-year deal in an interview with GMA host Robin Roberts. “We’re hoping to lift, not just women in sports and women in basketball, but women in society,” Engelbert said. Ogwumike said she hoped the deal would “set the tone” for women in other professional sports leagues.

Let’s break this down a bit.

The new WNBA maximum salary is less the NBA minimum salary. And the salary cap for each WNBA team is less than the salary for three out of four NBA players. With half of what the LA Lakers pay LeBron James, the WNBA could pay the salary of every player in its league.

And while the women now don’t have to share hotel rooms, the league still won’t allow teams to use charter flights for travel because it would be too onerous on the finances of some of the teams. It did, however, guarantee that the players would have premium economy seating on commercial flights, providing an extra five to seven inches of leg room.

Much has been made of the maternity leave. Too much, I think. The federal government requires family leave and many employers provide pay during the leave. It makes me wonder if the parent NBA offers paid leave for new fathers in its league.

The deal is also for eight years. That is an extraordinarily long time for a collective bargaining agreement, especially given the soaring popularity of women’s athletics. It might not be as short-sighted as short-selling Tesla stock, but the deal will outlive almost every player now in the league.

I guess what bothers me more than the details of the deal is the gee-golly-whiz way the giddy media is covering the deal, applying breathless adjectives like historic, ground-breaking and unprecedented.

The coverage has been great PR for the WNBA, but the league has underpaid and undervalued these athletes for a long time. In reality the salaries may have increased 53% but they still can’t compete with what women are able earn by playing overseas. And it’s a good bet most of them will continues to play in other parts of the world.

It’s not my hope that this deal sets the tone for women athletes (Sorry, Nneka). My “hope” is that the courts take up the lawsuit against the US Soccer and forces it to compensate the women’s National Soccer Team equally with the men’s soccer team. That would be a real “lift” to women in sports and society.

Oh, Baby

Congrats to USWNT star Alex Morgan and LA Galaxy midfielder Servando Carrasco, who announced yesterday they are expecting their first child in April.

Screen shot of @alexmorgan13 Twitter post
Alex Morgan announces her pregnancy via Twitter

The timing is remarkable. Morgan is due ten months after leading the US Women to a fourth World Cup (That’s some way to celebrate!) and three months before the opening of the 2020 Summer Olympic Games in Tokyo.

Morgan reportedly is planning on being a part of the Olympic team, but just the question of whether she would play highlights one of the unique issues female athletes face: How and when to have children. At 30, Morgan is in her athletic prime, and at a point where many women have started or have decided to start families. She and Carrasco met as first-year students at the University of California-Berkeley in 2007 and have been married five years, so wanting to start a family seems, well, not so surprising.

The inherent unfairness is that while the decision has little affect on Carrasco’s athletic career, it could (will) profoundly affect Morgan’s.

For example, Serena Williams took a year off competitive tennis when she had a child. Her return, at age 37, was somewhat fraught. She made the finals in three major tournaments but didn’t win them, and she has dropped in the rankings to 9th in the world. On the other hand, Kerry Walsh Jennings was five weeks pregnant when she won her third beach volleyball gold medal at the 2010 Olympics in London and Scottish golfer Catriona Matthew won the British Open less than three months after delivering her second daughter.

Closer to home, one-time USWNT player Sydney Leroux rejoined the Orlando Pride in September, three months after she gave birth. (That’s about the same time Morgan stepped away from, citing a nagging knee injury sustained in the World Cup.)

Some things transcend sport. Family lives are a prime case.

But, even so, here’s hoping we see Morgan on the pitch in Tokyo, and maybe Carrasco in the stands with their healthy baby in his arms.

The WNBA’s minimal wage

WNBA MVP Elena Delle Donne. (Photo from cnn.com)

After celebrating the Washington Mystics and their remarkable run to the WNBA championship, it’s important to take a minute to think about how we treat these athletes the rest of the year, especially whether or not they are fairly compensated.

Consider that the Sacramento Kings pay Dewayne Dedmon $13.3 million a year, which barely allows him to crack the top 100 among all NBA players, according to data compiled by ESPN.com.

That’s enough money to cover the WNBA’s entire payroll this season.

It’s outrageous that the total compensation for the 200 women on WNBA rosters doesn’t even add up to what a mediocre NBA team is willing to pay a journeyman center. The top salary in the WNBA is capped at $117,500. The median salary is closer to $55,000.

If you think that’s simply a reflection of their value, it is not. If you think it’s because the WNBA is losing money, it’s not. If you think it’s because nobody attends games, it’s not.

The NBA spends about 50% of league revenues on payroll, according to an analysis by Forbes magazine. On the other hand, the WNBA spends about 25% of league revenues on payroll.

The sports giant ESPN paid the WNBA $25 million a year for broadcast rights in 2018. This year, the league also cut a deal with CBS sports to televise 40 live primetime and weekend games. The league realizes at least $27 million a year in ticket revenue, with ticket sales this year again topping 1.5 million. That, by the way, is just about where the NBA was at its 23-year-mark. The WNBA also receives support, as a subsidiary partner, from the NBA. And there are other revenue streams such as concessions, merchandise, betting sites, etc. Exact numbers are difficult to come by in most cases because the leagues finances aren’t public. But even using the artificially low $52 million a year as a baseline revenue, the WNBA payroll is remarkably low by any objective business standard.

The economics don’t argue that the WNBA players should be paid on par with NBA players, but it does suggest that the players are undervalued by at least half, and probably more.

Kicking up a fuss

Carli Lloyd, one of the best players in the history of U.S. women’s soccer showed up this week at a practice for the NFL Philadelphia Eagles and almost on a lark booted a 55-yard field goal.

Lloyd kicked a 55-yard FG at an NFL pre-season practice between the Philadelphia Eagles and Baltimore Ravens.

The feat lit up the Twitterverse, made headlines and had a run through two full news cycles on ESPN. The tone of the reaction was almost entirely surprise, although anyone who follows the US Women’s National Team would hardly be shocked by Lloyd’s leg strength. In the 2015 World Cup final against Japan, she scored the third of her three goals from beyond midfield. (Watch the video: https://youtu.be/mBosyOJ3PIY)

But Lloyd’s practice kick, in a more serious vein, showed that the NFL may be moving closer to gender desegregation.

“Honestly, I don’t think it will be long before we see a woman break through this NFL barrier,” tweeted Gil Brandt, an NFL hall of famer and the Dallas Cowboys’ vice president of player personnel from 1960 to 1988. “I’d give her an honest tryout, if I were, say, the Bears.”

The Chicago Bears experience with kicker Cody Parkey in 2018 was a disaster, including the notorious “double-doink,” when a potential game-winner from 43 yards out was tipped at the line, then hit the left upright and the crossbar. The Bears lost that wild-card game 16-15 to the Eagles. The Bears released Parkey in the spring. This pre-season, they’ve looked at nine kickers — six rookies, three free agents.

Lloyd caught the eye of current NFL team managers, but was ambivalent about a career change.

“I’ve definitely got some inquiries, I’ve definitely got some people talking,” Lloyd told SI TV’s Planet Futbol TV. “Anything is possible but right now, I’m strictly a soccer player and we’ll see what the future holds.”

But are the rewards worth the risk?

As a rookie kicker, she would likely make the league minimum salary of $495,000. That would be a lateral move financially for Lloyd.

In 2017, she reportedly earned $400,000 after signing a three-month contract with Manchester City in the English Premiere League women’s division. After her EPL stint, she rejoined the Houston Dash in the National Women’s Soccer League, where the maximum salary was about $40,000. She was also on the roster of the USWNT for sixteen matches.

This year, playing for the national team in its run to the a second straight World Cup in France, Lloyd stands to make $260,000. (Of course, if the women received the same pay as the men’s national players, Lloyd’s compensation would have topped $1 million).

The cost to her reputation might be more dear.

To step up as the first woman to play in the NFL she would bring notoriety, but not necessarily in the same way as Jackie Robinson breaking the color barrier in Major League Baseball. Maybe more in the way of Bill Veeck signing Eddy Gaedel to the Chicago White Sox.

It would follow her everywhere.

It would be in the first sentence of her obituary.

It would likely overshadow her accomplishments on the soccer pitch, where she has won two Olympic gold medals (and potentially a third in 2020 if she remains with the USWNT), two World Cups, the golden boot and the golden ball awards as the leading scorer and best player in the 2015 World Cup, and was named FIFA Player of the Year in 2015 and 2016.

At 37 years old, Lloyd has already established her superstar credentials. She has nothing left to prove. Risking her stellar credentials for a  cameo in the NFL seems like the wrong choice.